Summrize Logo
All Categories

Snippets about: Law

Scroll left and right !

Introducing Behavioral Economics To The Legal Academy

Thaler and colleagues sought to bring insights from behavioral economics to the analysis of legal rules and regulations.

This behavioral law and economics approach contrasts with traditional law and economics, which relies heavily on rational choice theory. For instance, behavioral research shows the Coase theorem may fail due to endowment effects and fairness concerns, even with low transaction costs.

Likewise, behavioral findings on limited self-control, overconfidence, and impatience suggest regulations like mandatory retirement savings or consumer protection may sometimes be justified, challenging libertarian anti-paternalism dogma.

Behavioral law and economics aims to make legal analysis more realistic and empirically-grounded. But it remains controversial, especially the paternalism debate. Nonetheless, it has grown rapidly and influenced numerous legal domains, from contracts to criminal justice to corporate governance.

Section: 6, Chapter: 27

Book: Misbehaving

Author: Richard Thaler

Ethics Must Guide Professions Like Law, Medicine, and Business

For tyranny to take hold, professionals must ignore or abandon their ethical codes and simply follow the orders of the regime. This was crucial in Nazi Germany, where lawyers provided cover for illegal orders, doctors participated in grotesque experiments, businessmen exploited slave labor, and civil servants enabled genocidal policies. If key professions had simply adhered to basic ethics around human rights and human dignity, the Nazi machine would have had a much harder time implementing its agenda. Professionals must consult their conscience and be guided by ethics even, and especially, when a regime claims the situation is an exception.

Section: 1, Chapter: 5

Book: On Tyranny

Author: Timothy Snyder

The Mysterious Fall Of Crime In The 1990s

In the 1990s, crime fell precipitously across the United States. Violent crime plummeted 18% in the span of just three years from 1993-1996. This caught many experts by surprise, as the prevailing forecast at the time had been for a coming crime wave fueled by the crack epidemic and a rise of "superpredator" juvenile offenders.

So what explains the unexpected crime drop? The authors argue it was not the commonly cited reasons like innovative policing, stricter gun control, a stronger economy, or more use of capital punishment. While those may have played a role, the data suggests the real answer is a surprising one - the legalization of abortion 20 years prior, following Roe v. Wade. According to the authors, this was the hidden factor that quietly removed a large cohort of would-be violent criminals from the population.

Section: 1, Chapter: 4

Book: Freakonomics

Author: Steven D. Levitt, Stephen J. Dubner

The Principle of Legitimacy

For the law to be effective, it must be seen as legitimate by the population. Legitimacy has three components:

  1. People must feel they have a voice, and that if they speak up, they will be heard.
  2. The law must be predictable. There has to be a reasonable expectation that the rules tomorrow are going to be roughly the same as the rules today.
  3. The authority has to be fair. It can't treat one group differently from another.

When the British were seen as violating these principles in Northern Ireland, it created an opening for the IRA to position themselves as the legitimate authority in Catholic areas. Authority isn't just about power - it's about getting people to want to submit to your power. Establishing legitimacy is a precondition for authority to function.

Section: 3, Chapter: 7

Book: David and Goliath

Author: Malcolm Gladwell

How Three Strikes Laws Overshot the Inverted U-Curve

California's 1994 "Three Strikes" law was intended to reduce crime by imposing harsh sentences on repeat offenders. It was championed by Mike Reynolds, whose daughter had been murdered by two career criminals.

The law did initially lead to a drop in crime, as offenders were taken off the streets. However, the costs - both economic and social - soon started to outweigh the benefits. California's prison population exploded, as even minor crimes led to life sentences if they were a "third strike." This proved enormously expensive, and the state soon had to start cutting other vital services, like education, to pay for prisons.

So while a certain degree of harsher sentencing can deter crime, Three Strikes took it too far. It overshot the inverted U-curve, maximizing punishment to the point of diminishing returns.

Section: 3, Chapter: 8

Book: David and Goliath

Author: Malcolm Gladwell

The Limits of Power

Both the British Army in Ireland and California's Three Strikes law failed for the same fundamental reason: they were too confident in the utility of their own power. Both the British and California failed to ask themselves, "At what cost? And for how long?" They missed the inverted U-curve. Past a certain point, more force produces less compliance.

More punishment produces less deterrence. The marginal returns diminish, and the unintended consequences mount. Power is like medicine - it has an optimal dose range. Too little, and it's ineffective. Too much, and it becomes toxic. The trick is finding the sweet spot.

Section: 3, Chapter: 8

Book: David and Goliath

Author: Malcolm Gladwell

Books about Law

    Summrize Footer

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter

    Become smarter every day with key takeaways delivered straight to your inbox. Perfect for busy people who want to learn from the smartest minds in just minutes!